Cheryl Beise
Substantial evidence supported the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s finding that an inter partes review petitioner failed to show that a patent owned by Thales Visionix—claiming a method for tracking motion relative to a moving platform—was not obvious over a prior art patent combined with two additional references, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has held. (Elbit Systems of America, LLC v. Thales Visiounix, Inc., February 6, 2018, Wallach, E.).
A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.
More from our authors:
|
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. 
|
US Patent Law for European Patent Professionals, Second Edition by Audrey Nickel € |
|
Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view. 
|
The Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court by Pieter Callens & Sam Granata € |
The post USA: Elbit Systems of America, LLC v. Thales Visiounix, Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2017-1355, 06 February 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog.
